Options
Shankar Narasimhan S
Loading...
Preferred name
Shankar Narasimhan S
Official Name
Shankar Narasimhan S
Alternative Name
Narasimhan, S.
Narasimhan, Shankar
Narasimhan, Shankar S.
Main Affiliation
Email
ORCID
Scopus Author ID
Researcher ID
3 results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- PublicationData reconciliation for chemical reaction systems using vessel extents and shape constraints(01-01-2017)
;Srinivasan, Sriniketh ;Billeter, Julien; Bonvin, DominiqueConcentrations measurements are typically corrupted by noise. Data reconciliation techniques improve the accuracy of measurements by using redundancies in the material and energy balances expressed as relationships between measurements. Since in the absence of kinetic models these relationships cannot integrate information regarding past measurements, they are expressed in the form of algebraic constraints. This paper shows that, even in the absence of a kinetic model, one can use shape constraints to relate measurements at different time instants, thereby improving the accuracy of reconciled estimates. The construction of shape constraints depends on the operating mode of the reactor. Moreover, it is shown that the representation of the reaction system in terms of vessel extents helps identify additional shape constraints. A procedure for deriving shape constraints from measurements is also described. Data reconciliation using both numbers of moles and extents is illustrated via a simulated case study. - PublicationRobust and reliable estimation via Unscented Recursive Nonlinear Dynamic Data Reconciliation(01-12-2006)
;Vachhani, Pramod; The quality of process data in a chemical plant significantly affects the performance and benefits gained from activities like performance monitoring, online optimization and control. Since many chemical processes often exhibit nonlinear dynamics, techniques like Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Nonlinear Dynamic Data Reconciliation (NDDR) have been developed to improve the data quality. There are various issues that arise with the use of either of these techniques: EKF cannot handle inequality or equality constraints, while the NDDR has high computational cost. Recently a recursive estimation technique for nonlinear dynamic processes has been proposed which combines the merits of EKF and NDDR techniques. This technique, named as Recursive Nonlinear Dynamic Data Reconciliation (RNDDR), provides state and parameter estimates that satisfy bounds and other constraints imposed on them. However, the estimate error covariance matrix in RNDDR is computed in the same manner as in EKF, that is, the effects of both nonlinearity and constraints are neglected in the computation of the estimate error covariance matrix. A relatively new method known as the Unscented Kalman Filter has been developed for nonlinear processes, in which the statistical properties of the estimates are computed without resorting to linearization of the nonlinear equations. This leads to improved accuracy of the estimates. In this paper, we combine the merits of the Unscented Kalman Filter and the RNDDR to obtain the Unscented Recursive Nonlinear Dynamic Data Reconciliation (URNDDR) technique. This technique addresses all concerns arising due to the presence of nonlinearity and constraints within a recursive estimation framework, resulting in an efficient, accurate and stable method for real-time state and parameter estimation for nonlinear dynamic processes. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. - PublicationDeconstructing principal component analysis using a data reconciliation perspective(09-06-2015)
; Data reconciliation (DR) and principal component analysis (PCA) are two popular data analysis techniques in process industries. Data reconciliation is used to obtain accurate and consistent estimates of variables and parameters from erroneous measurements. PCA is primarily used as a method for reducing the dimensionality of high dimensional data and as a preprocessing technique for denoising measurements. These techniques have been developed and deployed independently of each other. The primary purpose of this article is to elucidate the close relationship between these two seemingly disparate techniques. This leads to a unified framework for applying PCA and DR. Further, we show how the two techniques can be deployed together in a collaborative and consistent manner to process data. The framework has been extended to deal with partially measured systems and to incorporate partial knowledge available about the process model.