Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • People
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Indian Institute of Technology Madras
  3. Publication8
  4. CFD prediction of combustion on direct injection diesel engine with two different combustion chamber configurations
 
  • Details
Options

CFD prediction of combustion on direct injection diesel engine with two different combustion chamber configurations

Date Issued
01-01-2013
Author(s)
Gnana Sagaya Raj, A.
Mallikarjuna J M 
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Venkitachalam, Ganesan
DOI
10.4271/2013-01-2804
Abstract
Direct injection diesel engines are used in both light duty and heavy duty vehicles because of higher thermal efficiency compared to SI engines. However, due to only short time available for fuel-air mixing, combustion process depends on proper mixing. As a result, DI Diesel engine emits more NOx and soot into the atmosphere. Therefore, to achieve better combustion with less emission and also to accelerate the fuel-air mixing to improve the combustion, appropriate design of combustion chamber is crucial. Hence, in this work a study has been carried out using CFD to evaluate the effect of combustion chamber configuration on Diesel combustion with two different piston bowls. The two different piston configurations considered in this study are centre bowl on flat piston and pentroof offset bowl piston. Combustion pressure, heat release rate, flame structure, fuel injection on flow field, spray structure, droplet diameter, droplet velocity, Nox and soot emissions have been calculated and the best piston configuration has been arrived. As combustion studies could not be validated, the flow field studies are validated. From this study, it is concluded that pentroof offset bowl piston configuration is better. © 2013 SAE International.
Volume
12
Indian Institute of Technology Madras Knowledge Repository developed and maintained by the Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback