Observation of the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D <sup>+</sup> → K <sup>+</sup> π <sup>0</sup> π <sup>0</sup> and D <sup>+</sup> → K <sup>+</sup> π <sup>0</sup> η

Date Issued
01-09-2022
Author(s)
Ablikim, M.
Achasov, M. N.
Adlarson, P.
Ahmed, S.
Albrecht, M.
Aliberti, R.
Amoroso, A.
An, M. R.
An, Q.
Bai, X. H.
Bai, Y.
Bakina, O.
Baldini Ferroli, R.
Balossino, I.
Ban, Y.
Begzsuren, K.
Berger, N.
Bertani, M.
Bettoni, D.
Bianchi, F.
Bloms, J.
Bortone, A.
Boyko, I.
Briere, R. A.
Brueggemann, A.
Cai, H.
Cai, X.
Calcaterra, A.
Cao, G. F.
Cao, N.
Cetin, S. A.
Chang, J. F.
Chang, W. L.
Chelkov, G.
Chen, G.
Chen, H. S.
Chen, M. L.
Chen, S. J.
Chen, X. R.
Chen, Y. B.
Chen, Z. J.
Cheng, W. S.
Cibinetto, G.
Cossio, F.
Cui, J. J.
Dai, H. L.
Dai, J. P.
Dbeyssi, A.
de Boer, R. E.
Dedovich, D.
Deng, Z. Y.
Denig, A.
Denysenko, I.
Destefanis, M.
De Mori, F.
Ding, Y.
Dong, J.
Dong, L. Y.
Dong, M. Y.
Dong, X.
Du, S. X.
Fan, Y. L.
Fang, J.
Fang, S. S.
Fang, Y.
Farinelli, R.
Fava, L.
Feldbauer, F.
Felici, G.
Feng, C. Q.
Feng, J. H.
Fritsch, M.
Fu, C. D.
Gao, Y. N.
Gao, Yang
Garzia, I.
Ge, P. T.
Geng, C.
Gersabeck, E. M.
Gilman, A.
Goetzen, K.
Gong, L.
Gong, W. X.
Gradl, W.
Greco, M.
Gu, L. M.
Gu, M. H.
Guan, C. Y.
Guo, A. Q.
Guo, A. Q.
Guo, L. B.
Guo, R. P.
Guo, Y. P.
Guskov, A.
Han, T. T.
Han, W. Y.
Hao, X. Q.
Harris, F. A.
He, K. L.
Heinsius, F. H.
DOI
Abstract
By analyzing e+e− annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.93 fb−1 collected at the center-of-mass energy of 3.773 GeV with the BESIII detector, we report the first observations of the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+→ K+π0π0 and D+→ K+π0η. The branching fractions of D+→ K+π0π0 and D+→ K+π0η are measured to be (2.1 ± 0.4stat ± 0.1syst) × 10−4 and (2.1 ± 0.5stat ± 0.1syst) × 10−4 with statistical significances of 8.8σ and 5.5σ, respectively. In addition, we search for the subprocesses D+→ K*(892)+π0 and D+→ K*(892)+η with K*(892)+→ K+π0. The branching fraction of D+→ K*(892)+η is determined to be (4.4−1.5stat+1.8± 0.2syst) × 10−4, with a statistical significance of 3.2σ. No significant signal for D+→ K*(892)+π0 is found and we set an upper limit on the branching fraction of this decay at the 90% confidence level to be 5.4 × 10−4. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Volume
2022
Subjects