Options
Corrigendum to “Substantial magnetoelectric response in 2/3[Pb(Mg<inf>1/3</inf>Nb<inf>2/3</inf>)O<inf>3</inf>]− 1/3[PbTiO<inf>3</inf>]-CoFe<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf> composites†[J. Alloy. Compd. 863 (2021) 158504] (Journal of Alloys and Compounds (2021) 863, (S0925838820348672), (10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158504))
Date Issued
15-11-2021
Author(s)
Channagoudra, Ganesha
Saw, Ajay Kumar
Dey, Koushik
Xavier, Deepa
Venkatesh, R.
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Shukla, D. K.
Dayal, Vijaylakshmi
Abstract
An article of this title was published in the Journal of Alloys and Compounds 863 (2021) 158504. Unfortunately, an error occurred in Fig. 4(e). In the published version Fig. 4(e) shows the plotting of tan δ vs frequency instead of αME vs frequency. The correct Fig. 4(e), embedded in Fig. 4 is displayed in this article: Followings are the instances influenced due to correction in Fig. 4(e) and should read as: Page 1 (abstract, line 7–8): The composite with 80:20 ratio is found to exhibit the highest magnetoelectric coefficient (αME) ~ 4.30 mV/cm Oe (at 1 kHz, 300 K), and the value of αME further increases with increasing frequency, reaches up to a value as large as three hundred times of this off-resonance value, at a resonance frequency of 288 kHz”. Page 2 (1st paragraph, line 19-21): “The αME value for 80:20 composite was found to be as high as ~ 1297 mV/cm Oe at its resonant frequency and ~ 4.30 mV/cm Oe at 1 kHz”. Page 7 (Table 2, 10th row): Replace “αME value 31.49 mV/cm Oe by 1297 mV/cm Oe and Resonant frequency 286 kHz by 288 kHz”. Page 7 (1st paragraph: line 1–5): “A maximum αME equal to 1297 mV/cm Oe has been obtained at 288 kHz, that refers to the resonance frequency of the applied AC magnetic field. This enhanced ME response is three hundred times greater than the value obtained at 1 kHz frequency for this 80:20 composite”. Page 7 (in conclusions, line 16–18): “The maximum value of the αME of 1297 mV/cm Oe was obtained for the 80:20 composite at its resonant frequency and ~ 4.30 mV/cm Oe at a frequency of 1 kHz”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Volume
882