Options
Adaptive learning and cross training improves R-wave detection in ECG
Date Issued
01-03-2021
Author(s)
Ganapathy, Nagarajan
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Deserno, Thomas M.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Automated R-wave detection plays a vital role in electrocardiography (ECG) and ECG-based computer-aided diagnosis. Recently, a multi-level one-dimensional (1D) deep learning approach was presented that shows good performance as compared to traditional methods. Methods: In this paper, we present several improvements of the multi-level 1D convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning approach using: (i) adaptive deep learning, (ii) cross-database training, and (iii) cross-lead training. For this, we consider ECG signals from four publicly available databases: MIT-BIH, INCART, TELE, and SDDB, having 109,404, 175,660, 6,708, and 1,684,447 annotated beats, respectively. Except for TELE, all databases provide at least two-lead recordings. To evaluate the improvements, experiments are performed with adaptive k-times cross-trained databases validation scheme (k = 5). The hypothesis tested are: (i) the improvements outperform the state-of-the-art, (ii) cross-database training and adaptive deep learning contribute, and (iii) additional databases or cross-lead training further improves the results. Results: Our proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art. In terms of F-measure, F = 99.75% and F = 95.25% is obtained for the MIT-BIH and TELE databases, respectively. Further, cross-database training (F = 98.02%) is found to be more effective than training on individual databases (F = 97.33%). The performance of our approach further improves when additional databases and different leads are used for training. Conclusion: Existing state-of-the-art methods perform low on noisy and pathological signals. Adaptive cross-data training identifies the optimal model. Using multiple datasets and leads allows analyzing noisy, pathological and mobile-recorded long-term ECG signals without ground truths. These conclusions are based on the comprehensive evaluation of four different databases, and in total, about 4.5 million annotated beats.
Volume
200